linux-kernel - proxy_pda was Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200612082206.20409.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:06:20 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@...en.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: proxy_pda was Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20

On Friday 08 December 2006 21:35, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> >   LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/i386/kernel/built-in.o: In function `math_emulate':
> > (.text+0x3809): undefined reference to `_proxy_pda'
> >   
> 
> Hm, in theory nothing should ever generate a reference to _proxy_pda. 
> What compiler are you using?

Looking at Arkadiusz' output file it looks like gcc 4.2 decided to CSE the
address :/

	movl	$_proxy_pda+8, %edx	#, tmp65

Very sad, but legitimate.

The only workaround I can think of would be to define it as a symbol
(or away in vmlinux.lds.S). Or do away with the idea of proxy_pda
again.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/