[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612090855590.14206@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:00:33 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcalloc: Re-order the first two out-of-order args to
kcalloc().
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On 12/9/06, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...dspring.com> wrote:
> > @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static int uss720_probe(struct usb_inter
> > /*
> > * Allocate parport interface
> > */
> > - if (!(priv = kcalloc(sizeof(struct parport_uss720_private), 1,
> > GFP_KERNEL))) {
> > + if (!(priv = kcalloc(1, sizeof(struct parport_uss720_private),
> > GFP_KERNEL))) {
>
> This one should be kzalloc
>
> You really ought to send these cleanups to akpm@...l.org with LKML
> cc'd to get them merged.
good point, and argh. good point in that any further patches that are
primarily stylistic and/or aesthetic like the above will be sent to
akpm, and CC'ed to list.
argh, in that i've already mentioned that, following the guidelines in
"SubmittingPatches", i prefer that each of my patches have one logical
purpose. once the order of the kcalloc() args is corrected, that
would be followed by a single subsequent patch that did the
kcalloc->kzalloc transformation all at once.
if that's *not* the way folks on this list wish to see patches, then
that advice should be removed from "SubmittingPatches."
as captain hollister once said to dave lister, "choose."
rday
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists