[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061209.140205.126778911.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:02:05 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: akpm@...l.org, mingo@...e.hu, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...e.de,
torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 10:59:52 +1100
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 03:19:02PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Like this?
> >
> > /* don't get messages out of order, and no recursion */
> > if (skb_queue_len(&npinfo->txq) == 0 &&
> > npinfo->poll_owner != smp_processor_id()) {
> > local_bh_disable(); /* Where's netif_tx_trylock_bh()? */
> > if (netif_tx_trylock(dev)) {
> > /* try until next clock tick */
> > for (tries = jiffies_to_usecs(1)/USEC_PER_POLL;
> > tries > 0; --tries) {
> > if (!netif_queue_stopped(dev))
> > status = dev->hard_start_xmit(skb, dev);
> >
> > if (status == NETDEV_TX_OK)
> > break;
> >
> > /* tickle device maybe there is some cleanup */
> > netpoll_poll(np);
> >
> > udelay(USEC_PER_POLL);
> > }
> > netif_tx_unlock(dev);
> > }
> > local_bh_enable();
> > }
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks Andrew!
I've applied this patch, thanks a lot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists