| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <457B3346.2020008@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:05:58 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com> CC: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm@...l.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix numerous kcalloc() calls, convert to kzalloc(). Robert P. J. Day wrote: > drivers/ata/pdc_adma.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/macintosh/smu.c | 2 +- > drivers/mtd/rfd_ftl.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/skge.c | 2 +- > drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c | 2 +- > drivers/pcmcia/omap_cf.c | 2 +- > drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c | 6 +++--- > drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > drivers/pnp/pnpbios/core.c | 14 +++++++------- > drivers/pnp/pnpbios/proc.c | 8 ++++---- > drivers/pnp/pnpbios/rsparser.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c | 2 +- > drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 2 +- > drivers/usb/misc/uss720.c | 2 +- > drivers/usb/net/rndis_host.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/cluster/heartbeat.c | 4 ++-- > fs/ocfs2/cluster/nodemanager.c | 6 +++--- > fs/ocfs2/cluster/tcp.c | 10 +++++----- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 4 ++-- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c | 4 ++-- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 6 +++--- > fs/ocfs2/localalloc.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/slot_map.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 6 +++--- > fs/ocfs2/super.c | 6 +++--- > fs/ocfs2/vote.c | 4 ++-- > include/linux/gameport.h | 2 +- > kernel/relay.c | 4 ++-- > net/sunrpc/svc.c | 2 +- > sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 4 ++-- > 34 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) This should really be split up and submitted separately. All the subsystems are constantly changing. Although merging these kinds of changes manually after eventual conflicts, it's still manual work for the maintainers which would be avoided by a little bit extra work by the submitter. A maintainer could get a merge conflict on a 100 lines long hunk because of an 8 lines long hunk that got upstream on a different route. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- ==-- -=--= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists