[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612090918.26508.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 09:18:26 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Ben Nizette <ben.nizette@...et.net.au>
Cc: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DervishD <lkml@...vishd.net>
Subject: Re: single bit errors on files stored on USB-HDDs via USB2/usb_storage
Am Samstag, 9. Dezember 2006 07:11 schrieb Ben Nizette:
> >>> Also, you mentioned that the corruption occurs systematically on certain
> >>> byte patterns. Therefore it's certainly not related to the cables.
> >> It'd guess that too, but who can that say for sure. :-|
> >
> > You may have a bit pattern that stresses the controllers and suddenly
> > a marginal cable may matter.
>
> The errors occur in strings of 0xFFs. From the USB standard:
>
> a “1” is represented by no change in level and a “0” is represented by a
> change in level
Yes, plus added stuffing bits.
> so this error-infested bytes are effectively long, quiet times on the
> wire. I would have thought this would be the _least_ stressful time for
> the controllers but maybe they are also more susceptible to noise during
> this period.
The longer you don't change the voltage the likelier are reciever and
transmitter to get out of sync.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists