lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 9 Dec 2006 18:57:37 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucb1400_ts depends SND_AC97_BUS

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 21:50:01 -0500 Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> On Saturday 09 December 2006 03:36, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> > 
> > This driver is an AC97 codec according to its help text.
> > However, if SOUND is disabled, the "select SND_AC97_BUS"
> > still inserts that into the .config file:
> > 
> > #
> > # Sound
> > #
> > # CONFIG_SOUND is not set
> > CONFIG_SND_AC97_BUS=m
> > 
> 
> I consider this abug in kconfig - users of "select" should not know
> full dependency chain for selected symbol.

Seems that I've heard that somewhere else.
so I agree with that part.

> > Even if the config software followed dependency chains on selects,
> > we should try to limit usage of "select" to library-type
> > code that is needed (e.g., CRC functions) instead of bus-type
> > support.
> >
> 
> I do not agree here - the way our directory structure is laid out
> "sound" comes after "Input device support" menuconfig entry.
> Your patch makes user go back and forth in menuconfig, which is
> awkward. I think using select is fine when an option depends on
> something down the stream. If user already had a chance to select
> necessary option then using "depends on" is preferred.

Traversing the menus is not difficult.
(It's easier in xconfig or gconfig than menuconfig IMO,
but not a big deal in any of them.)

Anyway, are you saying that the only fix for this build error
is to fix *config to handle select dependencies?
or could propose another way to handle the build error?

Thanks,
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ