[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <457D764E.9040308@garzik.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:16:30 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>,
Johann Borck <johann.borck@...sedata.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [take26-resend1 0/8] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
Comments:
* [oh, everybody will hate me for saying this, but...] to me, "kevent"
implies an internal kernel subsystem. I would rather call it "uevent"
or anything else lacking a 'k' prefix.
* I like the absolute timespec (and use of timespec itself)
* more on naming: I think kevent_open would be more natural than
kevent_init, since it opens a file descriptor.
* why is KEVENT_MAX not equal to KEVENT_POSIX_TIMER? (perhaps answer
this question in a comment, if it is not a mistake)
* Kill all the CONFIG_KEVENT_xxx sub-options, or hide them under
CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Application developers should NOT be left wondering
whether or support for KEVENT_INODE was compiled into the kernel.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists