[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1166012781.5695.18.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 07:26:21 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix NR_FILE_DIRTY underflow
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:12 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Still testing this patch, but it looks good so far.
>
> ---
> Just setting PG_dirty can cause NR_FILE_DIRTY to underflow
> which is bad (TM).
>
> Use set_page_dirty() which will do the right thing.
Actually, I'd prefer to have it do the right thing by getting rid of
that call to test_clear_page_dirty() inside
invalidate_inode_pages2_range(). That is causing loss of data integrity,
and is what is causing us to have to hack NFS in the first place.
Cheers
Trond
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
> fs/nfs/file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-git2/fs/nfs/file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-git2.orig/fs/nfs/file.c 2006-12-13 12:54:55.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6-git2/fs/nfs/file.c 2006-12-13 12:55:12.000000000 +0100
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static int nfs_release_page(struct page
> if (!(gfp & __GFP_FS))
> return 0;
> /* Hack... Force nfs_wb_page() to write out the page */
> - SetPageDirty(page);
> + set_page_dirty(page);
> return !nfs_wb_page(page->mapping->host, page);
> }
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists