[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1166032646.2790.39.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:57:25 -0600
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Douglas Gilbert <dougg@...que.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libata: Simulate REPORT LUNS for ATAPI devices
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 09:38 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Sorry, I should have clarified this earlier--the Quantum GoVault is a
> removable disk drive, not a CD-ROM. The device is reminiscent of Zip
> disks, but the cartridge is a sealed unit and contains a 2.5" SATA disk
> inside; hence it's not a CD-ROM. So the patch below won't work for me,
> because sdev->type == TYPE_DISK.
So it's a SATAPI device of type 0 ... that's fun ... but it still needs
a blacklist; it's governed by SBC which isn't ambiguous about the need
to support REPORT LUNS. Now, if it supported RBC instead of SBC, that's
different; RBC also makes REPORT LUNS optional. However, it is required
to indicate RBC support by being type 0xe.
> I wonder if the same sort of REPORT LUNS screw-up might apply to other
> ATAPI devices too, such as tape drives. Since we've seen that
> manufacturers of CD-ROMs and removable disks don't implement it, it
> would not surprise me if the other ATAPI devices don't either. But,
> that's speculation on my part.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists