[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061213203325.GL10475@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:33:25 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Metathronius Galabant <m.galabant@...glemail.com>,
stable@...nel.org, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>, akpm@...l.org,
torvalds@...l.org, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 46/61] fix Intel RNG detection
* dean gaudet (dean@...tic.org) wrote:
> just for the public record (i already communicated with Jan in private
> mail on this one)... i have a box which hangs hard starting at 2.6.18.2
> and 2.6.19 -- hangs hard during the intel hw rng tests (no sysrq
> response). and the hang occurs prior to the printk so it took some
> digging to figure out which module was taking out the system.
>
> Jan's patch gets the box past the hang... it seems like this should be in
> at least the next 2.6.19.x stable (and if there's going to be another
> 2.6.18.x stable then it should be included there as well).
Thanks for the data point. I wonder if you get SMI and never come back.
Do you boot with no_fwh_detect=1 or -1?
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists