[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1166049055.29505.47.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:30:55 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 09:14 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> the edge flow is easy. the level one is:
>
> - IRQ happens
> - kernel handler masks it and queue a msg for userland
> - later on, userland gets the message, talks to the device,
> (MMAP'ed mmio, acks the interrupt on the device itself) and
> does an ioctl/syscall/write/whatever to tell kernel it's done
> - kernel unmasks it.
That's simply not true.
- IRQ happens
- kernel handler runs and masks the chip irq, which removes the IRQ
request
- user space message get queued or waiting reader woken
- kernel handler returns IRQ_HANDLED, which reenables the irq in the PIC
- user space handles the device
- user space reenables the device irq
No need for an ioctl. Neither for edge nor for level irqs.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists