[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061213233128.GD3629@stusta.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:31:28 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jgarzik@...ox.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/loopback.c: convert to module_init()
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:18:48AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> 2006-12-14 00:12
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:01:43PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Loopback should be there before protocols are started. It makes sense
> > > to have a standard startup order.
> >
> > This actually becomes easier after my patch:
> >
> > Now that it's untangled from net_olddevs_init(), you can simply change
> > the module_init(loopback_init) to a different initcall level.
>
> Not really, the device management inits as subsys, the ip layer hooks
> into fs_initcall() which comes right after. The loopback was actually
> registered after the protocol so far. I think Adrian's patch is fine
> if the module_init() is changed to device_initcall().
It doesn't matter (and I don't care) since for the non-modular case
(that always applies for loopback), there's:
#define __initcall(fn) device_initcall(fn)
#define module_init(x) __initcall(x);
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists