[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061213011231.GA6361@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 02:12:31 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] net, 8139too.c: fix netpoll deadlock
* Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com> wrote:
> > (I'll queue it, if Linus doesn't pick it up; please CC me in the
> > future)
>
> I have lived with the "NAPI ->poll() handler runs in BH irq enabled
> context" rule for years. Is it definitely false/dead ?
>
> If so at least 8139cp needs the same fix.
hm, this isnt really about NAPI polling, but about the
netconsole/netpoll/netdump poll_controller() handler.
with netconsole, printk can be called from IRQ context (and is
frequently from IRQ context during bootup or module initialization), so
a BH rule isnt enough for them.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists