linux-kernel - Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165984783.23819.7.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:39:43 +0100
From:	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
Cc:	vojtech@...e.cz, ak@....de,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: BUG? atleast >=2.6.19-rc5, x86 chroot on x86_64

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 03:27 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <1165409880.15706.9.camel@...alhost>
> 
> On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:58:00 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> 
> > > Kasper, what problems (other that the annoying message) are you having?
> > if it had only been the messages i wouldnt have complained.
> > the thing is, when i get these messages, the app provoking them acts
> > very strange, and in some cases, my system simply hardlocks.
> 
> You can try the patch I sent you to see if it fixes the Wine app.
> (David thought I was proposing it for the mainline kernel but I just
> wanted to see whether it made a difference.)

do you think it may be a bug in the kernel? the stuff with wine that
gets thrown in the kernel messages? cause if it is, i ofcourse wish to
help by testing. one more thing, im 100% positive wine does NOT have
access to any fat32, cause i entirely removed the only disk having such
a filesystem, and it still likes to give this, however the last few
times i havent observed the app going nuts :)

> 
> As for the lockups, there are possibly other bugs lurking in 2.6.19.
yes, when the using-much-ram-perhaps-even-swap thing was mentioned i
came to think, cause i do happen to use alarmingly much swap. i noticed
a ~5 second lockup (where it actually returned to normal again) when i
reached ~50mb free ram, and this was outside the chroot.


> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/