lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1psamopjj.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:22:08 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> What is the problem you are trying to solve?
>
> 2 problems
> 1) irq's that irqbalance should not touch at all

This is easy we just need a single bit.  Not 128+ bytes on the huge
machines.

> 2) irqs that can only go to a subset of processors.
>
> 1) is very real today
> 2) is partially real on some of the bigger numa stuff already.

You have said you the NUMA cases is handled in another way already?
In which case irqs that can only got to a subset of processors
shouldn't be a problem.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ