[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1lklaooz1.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 01:34:26 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Add allowed_affinity to the irq_desc to make it possible to have restricted irqs
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>> 1) is very real today
>>> 2) is partially real on some of the bigger numa stuff already.
>>
>> You have said you the NUMA cases is handled in another way already?
>
> the numa case of "I prefer that cpu" is handled. Not the "I cannot work on
> those".
How is the NUMA case of I prefer that cpu handled?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists