[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45812C17.4090309@argo.co.il>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:48:55 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
To: Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Userspace I/O driver core
[why trim the cc?]
Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2006 10:44 schrieb Avi Kivity:
>
>
>> I understand one still has to write a kernel driver to shut up the irq.
>> How about writing a small bytecode interpreter to make event than
>> unnecessary?
>>
>> The userspace driver would register a couple of bytecode programs:
>> is_interrupt_pending() and disable_interrupt(), which the uio framework
>> would call when the interrupt fires.
>>
>> The bytecode could reuse net/core/filter.c, with the packet replaced by
>> the mmio or ioregion, or use something new.
>>
>>
>
> I think this would be overkill. The kernel module you have to write
> is _really_ very simple. And it has to be written only once, so even
> a manufacturer who employs no experienced kernel developers can
> easily outsource that task.
>
>
It has to be written once, but compiled for every kernel version and
$arch out there (for out of tree drivers), or it has to wait for the
next kernel release and distro sync (for in-tree drivers).
If we make userspace drivers possible, it makes sense that the entire
driver be in userspace, not just 98.7% of it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists