[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <458177B0.2090804@argo.co.il>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:11:28 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, thunder7@...all.nl,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Franck Pommereau <pommereau@...v-paris12.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clarify i386/Kconfig explanation of the HIGHMEM config
options
Theodore Tso wrote:
>> + 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer "off" here.
>>
>>
>
> I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
> than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
>
> If we want to be even more explicit about this, then if the CPU level
> selected by the user is greater than Pentium-M (or whatever is was the
> oldest CPU that didn't have NX support --- Arjan?) we shouldn't offer
> this choice at all, and force CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G. We can give the user
> a choice if CONFIG_EMBEDDED is enabled, but otherwise, if the CPU
> level is new enough, I think we can safely make the argument that for
> nearly all systems, they have enough memory and speed that perhaps we
> should just simply always use HIGHMEM64G.
>
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not a good name for PAE, which is a feature that
enables both large physical memory and nx.
IMO we should have CONFIG_PAE, selected by either CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G or a
new CONFIG_NO_EXEC.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists