[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612141818430.12730@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:20:02 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches
for 2.6.19]
> > The Ubuntu feisty fawn mess was a dangerous warning bell of where we're
> > going. If we don't stand up at some point, and ban binary drivers, we
> > will, I fear, end up with an unsustainable ecosystem for Linux when
> > binary drivers become pervasive. I don't want to see Linux destroyed
> > like that.
>
>Thing is, if kernel.org kernels get patched to disallow binary modules,
>whats to stop Ubuntu (or anyone else) reverting that change in the
>kernels they distribute ? The landscape doesn't really change much,
>given that the majority of Linux end-users are probably running
>distro kernels.
And even if the distros don't change it (all legal issues aside), there's
probably some free user who repacks the distro kernel.
/me eyeballs myself...
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists