[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4580A827.7080200@nersc.gov>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:25:59 -0800
From: Thomas Davis <tdavis@...sc.gov>
To: Dumitru Ciobarcianu <Dumitru.Ciobarcianu@...s.ro>
CC: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@...iler.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Postgrey experiment at VGER
Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
>> I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
>> the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
>> My prediction for next 200 days is that most spammers get the clue,
>> but it gives us perhaps 3 months of less leaked junk.
>
> IMHO this is only an step in an "arms race".
> What you will do in three months, remove this check because it will
> prove useless since the spammers will also retry ? If yes, why install
> it in the first place ?
>
>
spammers are already re-trying; but they give up after 10 minutes.
As the delay time increases, the chances of getting on a blacklist
increase, which makes it easier to identify a machine as a spamming bot.
I normally let my greyfilters run at 30 minutes deny, and 72hrs of
lease time on a IP/To/From tuplet. This setting seams to be pretty
effective in dropping spam; at one point, upto 10k spam vs. a couple
hundred ham messages.
thomsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists