[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061215104341.GA20089@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:43:41 +0000
From: 'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>
Cc: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...l.org>,
Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@...ru>,
'Christoph Hellwig' <hch@...radead.org>,
Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
devel@...nvz.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write
> +ssize_t
> +__generic_file_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
> + unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos)
I'd still call this generic_file_aio_write_nolock.
> + loff_t *ppos = &iocb->ki_pos;
I'd rather use iocb->ki_pos directly in the few places ppos is referenced
currently.
> if (ret > 0 && ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode))) {
> - ssize_t err;
> -
> err = sync_page_range_nolock(inode, mapping, pos, ret);
> if (err < 0)
> ret = err;
> }
So we're doing the sync_page_range once in __generic_file_aio_write
with i_mutex held.
> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> - ret = __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(iocb, iov, nr_segs,
> - &iocb->ki_pos);
> + ret = __generic_file_aio_write(iocb, iov, nr_segs, pos);
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>
> if (ret > 0 && ((file->f_flags & O_SYNC) || IS_SYNC(inode))) {
And then another time after it's unlocked, this seems wrong.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists