[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b69d1470612150652p609c38d2n9bff58bdb0a1edb7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:52:22 -0600
From: "Scott Preece" <sepreece@...il.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "Stefan Richter" <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jesper.juhl@...il.com,
akpm <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/v2] CodingStyle updates
On 12/15/06, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> > >> +Use one space around (on each side of) most binary and ternary operators,
> > >> +such as any of these:
> > >> + = + - < > * / % | & ^ <= >= == != ? :
> > >
> > > Actually, this should not be hard rule. We want to allow
> > >
> > > j = 3*i + l<<2;
> >
> > Which would be very misleading. This expression evaluates to
> >
> > j = (((3 * i) + l) << 2);
> >
> > Binary + precedes <<.
>
> Aha, okay. So this one should be written as
>
> j = 3*i+l << 2;
>
> (Well, parenthesses should really be used. Anyway, sometimes grouping
> around operator is useful, even if I made mistake demonstrating that.
---
I think the mistake illuminates why parentheses should be the rule. If
you're thinking about using spacing to convey grouping, use
parentheses instead...
scott
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists