linux-kernel - sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <17795.2681.523120.656367@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Date:	Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:50:01 +1100
From:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Jurriaan <thunder7@...all.nl>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]

On Friday December 15, thunder7@...all.nl wrote:
> From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> Date: Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:20:57PM +1100
> > i.e. current -mm is good for 2.6.20 (though I have a few other little
> > things I'll be sending in soon, they aren't related to the raid6
> > problem).
> > 
> 2.6.20-rc1-mm1 doesn't boot on my box, due to the fact that e2fsck gives
> 
> Buffer I/O error on device /dev/md0, logical block 0
> 

But before that....
> raid5: device sdh1 operational as raid disk 1
> raid5: device sdg1 operational as raid disk 0
> raid5: device sdf1 operational as raid disk 5
> raid5: device sde1 operational as raid disk 6
> raid5: device sdd1 operational as raid disk 7
> raid5: device sdc1 operational as raid disk 3
> raid5: device sdb1 operational as raid disk 2
> raid5: device sda1 operational as raid disk 4
> raid5: allocated 8462kB for md0
> raid5: raid level 6 set md0 active with 8 out of 8 devices, algorithm 2
> RAID5 conf printout:
>  --- rd:8 wd:8
>  disk 0, o:1, dev:sdg1
>  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdh1
>  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdb1
>  disk 3, o:1, dev:sdc1
>  disk 4, o:1, dev:sda1
>  disk 5, o:1, dev:sdf1
>  disk 6, o:1, dev:sde1
>  disk 7, o:1, dev:sdd1
> md0: bitmap initialized from disk: read 15/15 pages, set 1 bits, status: 0
> created bitmap (233 pages) for device md0
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sde1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 7 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sdg1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 6 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sdf1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 5 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sdc1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 4 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sdb1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 3 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sdh1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 2 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sdd1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 1 devices
> md: super_written gets error=-5, uptodate=0
> raid5: Disk failure on sda1, disabling device. Operation continuing on 0 devices

Oh dear, that array isn't much good any more.!
That is the second report I have had of this with sata drives.  This
was raid456, the other was raid1.  Two different sata drivers are
involved (sata_nv in this case, sata_uli in the other case).
I think something bad happened in sata land just recently.
The device driver is returning -EIO for a write without printing any messages.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/