| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:56:59 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Jurriaan <thunder7@...all.nl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm] On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:49, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The other box is mine and it works just fine with 2.6.20-rc1. > > > >> I think something bad happened in sata land just recently. > > > > Yup. Please see, for example: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116621656432500&w=2 > > > > It looks like the breakage is in sata, in the patches that went in after > > 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 (that one worked for me like charm). > > > So.... 2.6.20-rc1 works for you? Yes. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists