linux-kernel - Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45832095.9000503@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:24:21 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Jurriaan <thunder7@...all.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
	Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:05:52 -0800
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Jeff, I shall send all the sata patches which I have at you one single time
>>> and I shall then drop the lot.  So please don't flub them.
>>>
>>> I'll then do a rc1-mm2 without them.
>> hm, this is looking like a lot of work for not much gain.  Rafael, are
>> you able to do a quick chop and tell us whether these:
>>
>> pci-move-pci_vdevice-from-libata-to-core.patch
>> pata_cs5530-suspend-resume-support-tweak.patch
>> ata-fix-platform_device_register_simple-error-check.patch
>> initializer-entry-defined-twice-in-pata_rz1000.patch
>> pata_via-suspend-resume-support-fix.patch
>> sata_nv-add-suspend-resume-support.patch
>> libata-simulate-report-luns-for-atapi-devices.patch
>> user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-patch-ata-subsystem.patch
>> libata-fix-oops-with-sparsemem.patch
>> sata_nv-fix-kfree-ordering-in-remove.patch
>> libata-dont-initialize-sg-in-ata_exec_internal-if-dma_none-take-2.patch
>> pci-quirks-fix-the-festering-mess-that-claims-to-handle-ide-quirks-ide-fix.patch
>>
>> are innocent?
> 
> Yes, they are.

We all really appreciate your patience :)  This is good feedback.

To narrow down some more, does applying 2.6.20-rc1 + the attached patch 
work?  (ignoring -mm tree altogether)

The attached patch should /basically/ be the contents of Andrew's 
git-netdev-all patch.

	Jeff




View attachment "patch" of type "text/plain" (54857 bytes)