[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612150652.kBF6q9e0025520@zach-dev.vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:52:09 -0800
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] IOPL handling for paravirt guests
I found a clever way to make the extra IOPL switching invisible to
non-paravirt compiles - since kernel_rpl is statically defined to
be zero there, and only non-zero rpl kernel have a problem restoring IOPL,
as popf does not restore IOPL flags unless run at CPL-0.
Subject: IOPL handling for paravirt guests
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
diff -r 8110943fd7ad arch/i386/kernel/process.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/process.c Thu Dec 14 16:15:20 2006 -0800
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/process.c Thu Dec 14 16:21:57 2006 -0800
@@ -665,6 +665,15 @@ struct task_struct fastcall * __switch_t
load_TLS(next, cpu);
/*
+ * Restore IOPL if needed. In normal use, the flags restore
+ * in the switch assembly will handle this. But if the kernel
+ * is running virtualized at a non-zero CPL, the popf will
+ * not restore flags, so it must be done in a separate step.
+ */
+ if (get_kernel_rpl() && unlikely(prev->iopl != next->iopl))
+ set_iopl_mask(next->iopl);
+
+ /*
* Now maybe handle debug registers and/or IO bitmaps
*/
if (unlikely((task_thread_info(next_p)->flags & _TIF_WORK_CTXSW)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists