lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:28:35 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Mike Accetta <maccetta@...relnetworks.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change in multiple NFS mount behavior in 2.6.19?

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:46:28 -0500 Mike Accetta wrote:

> After upgrading an NFS client from 2.6.18 to 2.6.19 (and also with 
> 2.6.19.1) we see a change in behavior of multiple NFS mounts against the 
> same server (running 2.4.20 in this case).  With 2.6.18 we could mount 
> different pieces of the same remote file system with distinct read-only 
> and read-write attributes at corresponding places on the client.  With 
> 2.6.19 if the first mount is read-only, subsequent mounts seem to 
> inherit the read-only status even though not explicitly mounted read-only.
> 
> If I did the "git bisect" properly, the behavior changed with commit
> 54ceac4515986030c2502960be620198dd8fe25b and the description of this 
> commit seems like it could indeed have caused this behavior, but perhaps 
> not intentionally. I believe the client is making NFS V2 calls. Also, I 
> am still able to issue a "mount -o remount,rw" on the client to regain 
> read-write capability.  Was this a regression or is this now the 
> expected behavior for multiple NFS client mounts in 2.6.19?
> -- 

That would correspond to this bugzilla item, which explains
that multiple mount semantics for one filesystem are all shared.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7655

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ