[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061217201612.1c7ba106.khali@linux-fr.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:16:12 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] Make lm70_remove a __devexit function
Hi Ralf,
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 19:21:51 +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Saves a few bytes on the module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c
> index 6ba8473..7eaae38 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ out_dev_reg_failed:
> return status;
> }
>
> -static int __exit lm70_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> +static int __devexit lm70_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct lm70 *p_lm70 = dev_get_drvdata(&spi->dev);
>
You're not actually saving memory with this change, as __devexit is
resolved to either __exit (i.e. nothing changes) or nothing (i.e. the
code is now always compiled in.) This is a bugfix though as currently
the code may be striped away while the driver still holds a pointer to
it.
Good catch, applied (with a different header comment), thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists