[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612171037470.5411@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 10:40:45 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@...lark.us>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, James Lockie <bjlockie@...kie.ca>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: escape key]
On Dec 16 2006 19:51, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> It's something between a misdesign and a misconfiguration of the ESC key.
>>
>> In other words, many unices make ESC generate ^[, the general
>> terminal escape character that is _also_ generated by keys like "up",
>> ^[[A.
>>
>
> do man ascii - ESC is 0x1b.
> Thats what the esc key should generate - it sometimes echoed as ^[ because the
> [ = 0x5b
Ok I hoped people would be smart enough to figure, but let me rephrase in two
ways:
Many unices generate "\x1b" (^[) for ESC, which is also generated by
keys like "up", which generates "\x1b[A" (^[[A)
>> MS-DOS, or rather QBASIC's, Turbo BASIC's and other implementation of
>> keys, does not have this "bug": here ESC generates "\x1B" and "up"
>> generates "\x00H" IIRC. There is no key defined to generate "\x00".
>> => All fits nicely.
And QB generates "\x1b" (^[) while "up" generates "\x00H" (^@H).
Hope this makes things more clear - I interchangably used the ^ and the \
notation. Sorry if that confused anyone.
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists