linux-kernel - Re: [patch] debugging feature: SysRq-Q to print timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:45:49 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] debugging feature: SysRq-Q to print timers

On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 03:31:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
 > On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:56:58 +0100
 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
 > 
 > > ----------------->
 > > Subject: [patch] debugging feature: SysRq-Q to print timers
 > > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
 > > 
 > > add SysRq-Q to print pending timers and other timer info.
 > 
 > I must say that I've never needed this feature or /proc/timer-list, and I
 > don't recall ever having seen anyone request it, nor get themselves into a
 > situation where they needed it.

/proc/timer-list is useful for profiling applications doing excessive wakeups.
With the move towards being tickless, this is more important than ever,
and giving users the right tools to find these problems themselves is important.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/