lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1166436717.10372.58.camel@twins>
Date:	Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:11:57 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	andrei.popa@...eo.ro
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
	Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
	Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19 file content corruption on ext3

On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 12:00 +0200, Andrei Popa wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 01:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: 
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:19:04 +0200
> > Andrei Popa <andrei.popa@...eo.ro> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I tried latest git with the patch from this email and it still get file
> > > content corruption. If I can help you further debug the problem tell me
> > > what to do.
> > 
> > Can you please tell us all the steps which we need to take to reproduce this?
> 
> I'm using rtorrent-0.7.0 and libtorrent-0.11.0, just download a torrent
> with multiple files(I downloaded 84 rar files) and when it will finish
> it will do a hash check and at the end of the check will say "Hash check
> on download completion found bad chunks, consider using "safe_sync"."
> and stop and most of the downloaded files are broken. With Peter
> Zijlstra patch this error doesn't show but there is file
> corruption(although less files are corrupted); afther the hash check,
> rtorrent will download the bad chunks and do another hash check and all
> files are ok.

OK, I'll try this on a ext3 box. BTW, what data mode are you using ext3
in?


Also, for testings sake, could you give this a go:
It's a total hack but I guess worth testing.

---
 mm/rmap.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6-git/mm/rmap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-git.orig/mm/rmap.c	2006-12-18 11:06:29.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-git/mm/rmap.c	2006-12-18 11:07:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int page_mkclean_one(struct page 
 		goto unlock;
 
 	entry = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, pte);
-	entry = pte_mkclean(entry);
+	/* entry = pte_mkclean(entry); */
 	entry = pte_wrprotect(entry);
 	ptep_establish(vma, address, pte, entry);
 	lazy_mmu_prot_update(entry);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ