[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061219094017.GM21070@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:40:18 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] lock debugging: fix DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() & debug_locks_silent
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:31:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> wrote:
>
> > > if (unlikely(c)) { \
> > > - if (debug_locks_silent || debug_locks_off()) \
> > > + if (!debug_locks_silent && debug_locks_off()) \
>
> btw., updated patch is below - the right order is to first do
> debug_locks_off(), then debug_locks_silent.
Then how does one re-enable lock debugging after running the locking
testsuite?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists