[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061219000234.GA5330@localdomain>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:02:34 +0200
From: Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_execute_async() should add to the tail of the queue
Hello,
scsi_execute_async() has replaced scsi_do_req() a few versions ago,
but it also incurred a change of behavior. I noticed that over-queuing
a SCSI device using that function causes I/Os to be starved from
low-level queuing for no justified reason.
I think it makes much more sense to perserve the original behaviour
of scsi_do_req() and add the request to the tail of the queue.
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <da-x@...atomic.org>
diff -p -urN a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-12-19 01:48:50.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-12-19 01:49:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ int scsi_execute_async(struct scsi_devic
sioc->data = privdata;
sioc->done = done;
- blk_execute_rq_nowait(req->q, NULL, req, 1, scsi_end_async);
+ blk_execute_rq_nowait(req->q, NULL, req, 0, scsi_end_async);
return 0;
free_req:
--
Dan Aloni
XIV, http://www.xivstorage.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists