[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061219042607.dcd865a3.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:26:07 -0800
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jes@....com, hch@....de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, sgrubb@...hat.com, linux-audit@...hat.com,
systemtap@...rces.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Task watchers v2
Matt wrote:
> Previous iterations of task watchers would prevent the code in these
> paths from being inlined. Furthermore, the code certainly wouldn't be
> placed near the table of function pointers (which was in an entirely
> different ELF section). By placing them adjacent to each other in the
> same ELF section we can improve the likelihood of cache hits in
> fork-heavy workloads (which were the ones that showed a performance
> decrease in the previous iteration of these patches).
Ah so - by marking some of the fork (and exit, exec, ...) routines
with the WATCH_TASK_* mechanism, you can compact them together in the
kernel's text pages, instead of having them scattered about based on
whatever source files they are in.
Nice.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists