linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612191850220.1867@scrub.home>
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:53:22 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
cc:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kbuild-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax

Hi,

On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:41:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > 
> >   Remove the note in the documentation that suggests people can use
> > "requires" for dependencies in Kconfig files.
> >...
> 
> Considering that noone uses it, what about the patch below to also 
> remove the implementation?

Mostly to keep the noise in the generated files low I prefer to just add 
some warning prints and I'll remove them later with some other syntax 
changes. This would also give external trees the chance to fix any 
possible usage first.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/