[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1166559785.3365.1276.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:23:05 +0100
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david-b@...bell.net, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: Changes to sysfs PM layer break userspace
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 20:08 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:03:21PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > humm shouldn't the driver do this when the interface is brought down?
> > sounds like you're playing with fire to do this behind the drivers'
> > back....
>
> I'm not sure. Suspending the chip means you lose things like link beat
> detection, so it's not something you necessarily want to automatically
> tie to something like interface status.
right now the "spec" for Linux network drivers assumes that you put the
NIC into D3 on down, except for cases where Wake-on-Lan is enabled etc.
> Some chips support more
> fine-grained power management, so we could do something more sensible in
> that case - but right now, there doesn't seem to be a lot of driver
> support for it.
sounds like that's the right approach at least .. not talking to the PCI
hardware directly from userspace...
I can see the point of having more than just "UP" and "DOWN" as
interface states; "UP", "DOWN" and "OFF" for example...
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists