linux-kernel - Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1166508521.3800.40.camel@monteirov>
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2006 06:08:41 +0000
From:	Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@...giomb.no-ip.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>,
	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
	Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@....ch>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Brice Goglin <brice@...i.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma@...all.nl>,
	Tomasz Koprowski <tomek@...rowski.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 00:47 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> So we have the following situation:
> - 2.6.16    - 2.6.16.16 : problems for Chris
>                           (and possibly many other people)
> - 2.6.16.17 - 2.6.16.35 : problems for many other people
>                           (I remember 4-5 bug reports in the kernel
>                            Bugzilla alone)
> 
> The fix in 2.6.19 was considered suboptimal, and Alan's patch for
> fixing 
> this whole issue more properly is currently not even in your tree.  

Right,
Those 4-5 bug reports should test Alan's patch.
All the problem is detected the correct devices that should be quirked.
In 2.6.16, all ( PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID), in 2.6.16.17 just some.
Still questionable if this quirks is for on-board VIA when interrupts
are in PIC mode, or for all interrupts modes (historically before the
patch to be for IO-APIC and PIC mode, was just for PIC mode, but in that
time IO-APIC wasn't common on PC) .
So with Alan's patch the question is:if a device need to be quirked and
don't. 
Those 4-5 reports will answer the question, they needs VIA quirks and we
want know is the patch do the right job. 
My laptop that need the quirks and I can test it is not available right
now and I am too busy to test on it, sorry.

Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M.B.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (2166 bytes)