[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061220011707.25341.6522.sendpatchset@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:20:39 -0500
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
Andrew, Andi,
I didn't hear any objections (or really, any comments) on my
last release, so as I mentioned then, I want to go ahead and push this
to Andrew for a bit of testing in -mm. Hopefully targeting for
inclusion in 2.6.21 or 2.6.22.
Here's the performance data from the last release:
Vanilla TSC:
149 nsecs per gtod call
367 nsecs per CLOCK_MONOTONIC call
288 nsecs per CLOCK_REALTIME call
Vanilla ACPI PM:
1272 nsecs per gtod call
1335 nsecs per CLOCK_MONOTONIC call
1273 nsecs per CLOCK_REALTIME call
GENERIC_TIME TSC:
149 nsecs per gtod call
304 nsecs per CLOCK_MONOTONIC call
275 nsecs per CLOCK_REALTIME call
GENERIC_TIME ACPI PM:
1273 nsecs per gtod call
1275 nsecs per CLOCK_MONOTONIC call
1273 nsecs per CLOCK_REALTIME call
So almost no performance change.
New in the current C8 release:
o Synced up w/ 2.6.20-rc1
o Added a few small cleanups from Ingo
Let me know if you have any thoughts or comments!
thanks again!
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists