linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:26:50 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:20:39 EST, john stultz said:
> 	I didn't hear any objections (or really, any comments) on my 
> last release, so as I mentioned then, I want to go ahead and push this 
> to Andrew for a bit of testing in -mm. Hopefully targeting for 
> inclusion in 2.6.21 or 2.6.22.

Am running it on a Dell Latitude D820 (Core2 T7200 cpu).  I had to un-do
4 conflicting patches in -rc1-mm1 and then it applied and ran clean, I still
need to look at re-merging them:

hpet-avoid-warning-message-livelock.patch
clockevents-i386-hpet-driver.patch
get-rid-of-arch_have_xtime_lock.patch
x86_64-mm-amd-tsc-sync.patch

It *looks* like all the pieces are there except a few lines of Kconfig
magic to wire up the dynticks/NO_HZ stuff - or did I miss something crucial?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped