[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061220210736.GC28900@slug>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:07:36 +0000
From: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...e.fr>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Andrew J. Barr" <andrew.james.barr@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
walt <w41ter@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:53:33PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > It works too, thanks. BTW, I wondered if the "case GS:" in getreg() made
> > sense now?
>
> Sorry, what do you mean? It looks OK to me, but I'm not sure what
> you're referring to.
My bad, that's the code I'm referring to:
121 static unsigned long getreg(struct task_struct *child,
122 unsigned long regno)
[...]
126 switch (regno >> 2) {
127 case GS:
128 retval = child->thread.gs;
129 break;
What seem weird to me is that putreg(GS) will end up putting 'value' in:
child->thread.esp0 - sizeof(struct pt_regs) + (GS - 1)*4
whereas getreg(GS) will return the value of child->thread.gs
I must miss something, but the symetry seemed odd to me.
Regards,
Frederik
>
> J
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists