[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13yc6wkb4m09f$.e9chic96695b.dlg@40tude.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:06:43 +0100
From: Giuseppe Bilotta <bilotta78@...pop.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Open letter to Linux kernel developers (was Re: Binary Drivers)
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:34:53 +0200, Hannu Savolainen wrote:
> For a professional developer of any software the decision of open
> sourcing it is not easy. "Just for fun" developers have no problems
> because they don't expect to be able to live on their work anyway.
> However a professional developer can release software under GPL only if
> it's considered invaluable or if there is some way to guarantee
> sufficient income. Releasing something under GPL without a guaranteed
> backup plan is like jumping from an airplane without parasuit.
Except that we're talking about *hardware* companies here, not
*software* companies. *Hardware* companies make money by selling
*hardware*, not the software that drives it: in fact, they always
distribute the 'software' they write (the drivers) for free (gratis).
So while what you say is perfectly sensible for *software* developers,
it has absolutely nothing to do with the closed source drivers
*hardware* companies distribute.
This all being said, I think that the only thing that can shake
companies such as nVidia and ATI is a project such as the Open
Graphics Card
http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=Open-Graphics
to succeed.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Hic manebimus optime
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists