[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612201420140.3576@woody.osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:25:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrei Popa <andrei.popa@...eo.ro>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>,
gordonfarquharson@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one (was: 2.6.19 file content
corruption on ext3)
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>
> This patch removes some questionable code that attempted to make a
> no-longer-used page easier to reclaim.
If so, "cancel_dirty_page()" may actually be the right thing to use, but
only if you can guarantee that the page isn't mapped anywhere (and from
the name of the function I guess it's not something that you'll ever map?)
So the JFS code _looks_ like you could just replace the
clear_page_dirty(page);
with
cancel_dirty_page(page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
(where that second parameter is just used for statistics - it updates the
"cancelled IO" byte-counts if CONFIG_TASK_IO_ACCOUNTING is set - so the
number doesn't really matter, you could make it zero if you never want the
thing to show up in the IO accounting).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists