lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:08:40 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> To: ltuikov@...oo.com Cc: Jurriaan <thunder7@...all.nl>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Subject: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm] On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:26:00 -0800 (PST) Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@...oo.com> wrote: > The reason was that my dev tree was tainted by this bug: > > if (good_bytes && > - scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL) > + scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL) > return; > > in scsi_io_completion(). I had there !!result which is wrong, and when > I diffed against master, it produced a bad patch. Oh. I thought that got sorted out. It's a shame this wasn't made clear to me.. > As James mentioned one of the chunks is good and can go in. Please send a new patch, not referential to any previous patch or email, including full changelogging. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists