[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1166573863.5768.10.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:17:43 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Michal Sabala <lkml@...hbs.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.18 mmap hangs unrelated apps
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 16:03 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:19:38 -0500
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no> wrote:
>
> > NFS: Fix race in nfs_release_page()
> >
> > invalidate_inode_pages2() may set the dirty bit on a page owing to the call
> > to unmap_mapping_range() after the page was locked. In order to fix this,
> > NFS has hooked the releasepage() method. This, however leads to deadlocks
> > in other parts of the VM.
>
> hmm, subtle.
>
> > Fix is to add a new callback: flushpage(), which will write out a dirty
> > page that is under the page lock.
> >
>
> I guess this might permit us to clean up some of the nasties in
> invalidate_inode_pages2() - if the page comes dirty again, write it again.
> But the requirement that the page remain locked makes it hard. Need to
> think about it some more.
This was one of the reasons why I had to introduce
nfs_writepage_locked() for 2.6.20 (the other reason being readpage()).
The problem is that you can only protect against redirtying of the page
by holding the page lock across the call to unmap_mapping_range(), the
page writeout and the page removal.
> Are you sure this is the cause of the NFS problem?
>
> > .prepare_write = nfs_prepare_write,
> > .commit_write = nfs_commit_write,
> > .invalidatepage = nfs_invalidate_page,
> > - .releasepage = nfs_release_page,
>
> A NULL ->releasepage means that try_to_release_page() will call
> try_to_free_buffers() if PagePrivate(). I suspect you'll need a stub to
> prevent this.
Ack, I'll add one in. If PagePrivate() is set during the call to
try_to_release_page(), then the page should never be freeable.
> (We were supposed to stop doing that about four years ago - change it so
> that all a_ops must implement ->releasepage, but nobody got around to it).
Would you still be interested in seeing this done?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists