[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061220221252.732f4e97.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:12:52 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:12:35 -0800
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> +/* REVISIT these macros are correct, but suffer code explosion
> + * for non-constant parameters. Provide out-line versions too.
> + */
> +#define gpio_get_value(gpio) \
> + (GPLR(gpio) & GPIO_bit(gpio))
> +
> +#define gpio_set_value(gpio,value) \
> + ((value) ? (GPSR(gpio) = GPIO_bit(gpio)):(GPCR(gpio) = GPIO_bit(gpio)))
Why not implement them as inline functions?
Or non-inline functions, come to that.
Either way, programming in C is preferable to this ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists