[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612202245.21524.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:45:20 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Victor <andrew@...people.com>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>, jamey.hicks@...com,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...sta.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 3/6] AT91 GPIO wrappers
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:10 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:11:19 -0800
> David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
>
> > +static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> > + { return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio); }
> > +
> > +static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> > + { (void) at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value); }
>
> whaa? Where'd we pull that coding style from?
School of concision. Notice also the clever ";) at the end of each line.
> Please,
I see you fixed this in what you merged to MM; thanks.
- Dave
> static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned gpio)
> {
> return at91_get_gpio_value(gpio);
> }
>
> static inline void gpio_set_value(unsigned gpio, int value)
> {
> at91_set_gpio_value(gpio, value);
> }
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists