linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one (was: 2.6.19 file content corruption on ext3)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612210915570.3394@woody.osdl.org>
Date:	Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:19:19 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Andrei Popa <andrei.popa@...eo.ro>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
	Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...ibm.com>,
	gordonfarquharson@...il.com,
	"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one (was: 2.6.19 file content
 corruption on ext3)



On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> I can't see that it is the business of invalidate_inode_pages2() to
> resolve races between ->direct_IO() and pages that are redirtied by
> mmap(). All it needs to ensure is that pages that clean are discarded,
> since those are neither consistent with data that the ->directIO() call
> wrote to the disk nor are they scheduled to be written to disk.

Sure, we could happily just remove the -EIO. Alternatively, we could still 
do all the invalidates over the whole range, and return -EIO at the end of 
any of the pages weren't invalidated because they had to be written back. 

I don't personally care whether we should just return success or something 
to indicate that there were busy pages, but somebody who _uses_ direct-IO 
might want to know that the thing didn't throw away everything. If you 
know such users, can you ask them?

(Maybe "-EAGAIN" is better than "-EIO", since it's not really even a fatal 
error).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/