linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061221093701.7358642c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Dec 2006 09:37:01 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Bob Picco" <bob.picco@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, clameter@...r.sgi.com,
	apw@...dowen.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, bob.picco@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid()
 [0/2]

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:06:28 -0500
"Bob Picco" <bob.picco@...com> wrote:

> Sorry I was looking for AIM VII and/or reaim which are multiuser loads.
> The results (2.6.20-rc1-mm1) for EXTREME, SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP and
> SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP+your+patch are below. Note SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP AIM VII
> wasn't benchmarked to higher load limit because of my time constraints. 
> The runs should be repeated more times.

Thank you.
> 
> Any difference between the three configurations looks insignificant and
> within benchmark noise.
> 
looks so ;)

Because I'm now exhausted by other works, I can't go ahead until the next year.
My concern is io-benchmark like iozone.

Andrew-san, please drop the patch set if anyone isn't interested in.
I'll retry with new benchmark result if necessary.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/