[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612202057.09545.flamingice@sourmilk.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:57:05 -0500
From: Michael Wu <flamingice@...rmilk.net>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 20:15, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Because it works on the common hardware? If there's documentation about
> what userspace can legitimately expect, then I'm happy to defer to that.
> But in the absence of any indication as to what functionality users can
> depend on, deciding that existing functionality is a bug is, well,
> impolite.
>
No, it's absolutely a bug. It just so happens that some drivers incorrectly
allowed it.
-Michael Wu
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists