lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4589F39C.7010201@gentoo.org>
Date:	Wed, 20 Dec 2006 21:38:20 -0500
From:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC:	Michael Wu <flamingice@...rmilk.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network drivers that don't suspend on interface down

Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> In order to scan, we need to have the radio on and we need to be able to send 
>> and receive. What are you gonna turn off?
> 
> The obvious route would be to power the card down, but come back up 
> every two minutes to perform a scan, or if userspace explicitly requests 
> one. Would this cause problems in some cases?

I don't think it makes sense. For zd1211 the power consumption and heat 
emission goes up considerably when the interface is brought up (radio 
on, interrupts enabled, etc), and this is also a relatively long 
operation in terms of duration needed to bring the interface up and 
down. A scanning operation requires radio on, interrupts enabled, lots 
of register reading, RF calibration, RX/TX ringbuffers allocation, etc.

I don't think that supporting scanning when the interface is supposed to 
be disabled is sensible. If you want to scan, you are simply sending and 
receiving frames, it's no different from having the interface up and 
sending/receiving data frames.

There are additional implementation problems: scanning requires 2 
different ioctl calls: siwscan, then several giwscan. If you want the 
driver to effectively temporarily bring the interface up when userspace 
requests a scan but the interface was down, then how does the driver 
know when to bring it down again?

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ